mistressofmuses: A smiling white dandelion seedhead says "blow me," after which the seeds are scattered. (blow me)
mistressofmuses ([personal profile] mistressofmuses) wrote2022-05-04 09:12 pm

Enjoy some parenthetical anger

Okay yeah, my political thoughts boil down to:

Fuck every single person who claimed we (in general) or I (in particular) were overreacting to things (elections, appointments of judges, etc.) by thinking that we would wind up exactly where we are right now. (Including the people who meant it as a comforting thing: "relax, I know you're worried, but no one will EVER succeed in going after Roe v. Wade. It's codified law, it's not going away.")
And additionally fuck every eyerolling shit coming in on every post about this by claiming we're now overreacting for being concerned about Griswold or Lawrence or Obergefell (or Loving or Brown, for that matter.) I realize there's a line in the opinion about how this alone isn't supposed to be precedent for other decisions... except that if the Roe "decision" rides on the idea that "this isn't explicitly named in the constitution and also isn't firmly rooted in the history of the nation" (to paraphrase), then all of those decisions could ALSO face challenges based on the same "logic."
(Not that it is logical. These were supreme court cases in part BECAUSE they weren't "rooted in history." If they had been "rooted in history", they wouldn't have been problems that required judicial action to solve.)

Loving and Brown probably aren't as likely to face immediate challenges. But give it a few years and a few more openly white supremacist lawmakers, and it really DOESN'T sound impossible that those could get shoved into the same "well, it should really be up to the states, shouldn't it?" category.

In terms of Roe v. Wade, I'm "lucky". I'm in a state with additional protections (though ones that are still whim to changing political landscapes that could be overturned if the winds shift.) I am in a relationship with someone who also doesn't want kids, and we don't do much that could result in an oops anyway.
Not everyone I know and care about is so lucky.
But even if a pregnancy would be physically safe for me (which is not guaranteed), it would not be mentally or emotionally healthy. I am 100% genuinely serious when I say I would rather die than be pregnant, and if those, through horrid circumstance, become my only choices? Well.
spikedluv: (summer: sunflowers by candi)

[personal profile] spikedluv 2022-05-05 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
*hugs* This is awful. I can't believe how far backwards we're going.

I just heard someone on my radio station this morning (they do a round table discussion that I listen to) say both A) if people believed Kavanaugh (I think they were talking about him) when he said Roe vs Wade was 'settled doctrine' (or whatever the term is) in the hearings, well then . . . As if we all got what we deserved because we believed him. Someone else on the panel called him out and was like, so it's okay to just lie in the hearings now?!! and B) that he read the decision and no one was going after gay marriage . . . And I was like, buddy, we can see the writing on the freaking wall. Of course he was one of the few conservatives they have on the panel, but even so I couldn't believe what I was hearing. Talk about naive. Or just wanting people to settle down so the conservatives can keep on keeping on.

*deep breath*
kn0tme: (Default)

[personal profile] kn0tme 2022-05-07 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
The bottom line is, if Alito is willing to invent reasons that RvW is not Constitutional, where does that end? We've become a full-blown theocratic autocracy. It's not about freedom of speech - it's about THEIR freedom of speech. It's not about freedom of religion - it's about freedom to practice THEIR religion. Judaism is quite clear on the subject and it's why, despite the ultraconservative orthodox Jews controlling Israel, abortion is legal in Israel - because the woman's health comes first!

I've seen doctors (ok, a male chiropractor -- so a witch doctor) post that "you'd think intelligent women who don't want children would just take birth control". And there lies the problem - the underlying misogyny combined with just plain lack of education.

But sure, let's worry about perceived CRT in math books.

And this is coming from a male. I can't imagine what it is like to be a woman of childbearing age in the US now.

kn0tme: (Default)

[personal profile] kn0tme 2022-05-11 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
I'm trying to wrap my head around how interstate travel will work for women with IUD's. Think about it - can you be arrested for traveling across state lines if you have one and there is a suspicion of sex? Talk about "what happens in the bedroom...."! Do they expect women to remove then at the border? Maybe there will be screenings at the border rest stops now? It's insane that these questions are no longer rhetorical.