That NaNoWriMo thing...
Sep. 4th, 2024 08:28 pmSure, there are concerns about ableism and privilege surrounding writing and publishing! Generative AI does not address those inequalities. Generative AI is built on the theft of works by the people who did actually write, and it appeals to *statistical likelihood* rather than any sense of true creativity (another place in which it can exacerbate issues of inequality.) Plenty of people have said more and better about that aspect of it.
Ultimately, putting in a prompt to the generative AI of your choice and having it spit out 50000 words is deeply not the same as writing 50000 words yourself. The idea that it's being treated like it is is... garbage.
For the record, I didn't have much of an issue with their previous stance, which was basically "this challenge is done on the honor system, so it's not like we can police the use of AI any more than we can enforce any of the other rules. It'd make the challenge itself pretty pointless though, so why bother?"
Because sure, people have always cheated: you can copy paste the same word 50000 times if you want to, or you can just straight up lie and say you wrote when you didn't. They don't even have a "verification" for the words written any longer*, so you can easily just lie about how much you wrote and still "win." The only person who would know would be you.
(*As a side note, there's been some sort-of scaremongering about this now being a scam to steal participants' work to feed into an AI training set, but the verification where you paste in your work to validate your wordcount hasn't been a thing for years. It's purely honor-system based on how many words you self-report having written. So as garbage as I think this move is, it ISN'T a scheme to steal your writing.)
So yes, cheating has always been possible, but this is the first time the organization has basically said that yes, any type of cheating you want to do (because that IS what having an AI "write" a novel for you is) is equally valid as... actually participating, and actually struggling to get that 50k.
The whole tone of the challenge has always seemed, to me, to be pressure... but not too much. Writing that much is a LOT, and it IS hard, and it's meant to be! But it's also never been about winning at all costs; it's been about building up habits, making progress, finding community, pushing past the inner critic and over-editor that inhibits your ability to get words on the page, allowing yourself to prioritize writing and see how much you can get done when you do. Ideally, you find positives through the act of trying to reach that goal, even if you don't win.
I've done NaNoWriMo MANY times. I've "won" several of those times, and I have not "won" several of those times. I haven't ever gotten a ready-to-publish novel out of the challenge, but I HAVE gotten good things out of it in the past! I've gotten 50k done on a WIP, or I've gotten a crappy first draft that highlighted what *didn't* work about the idea and needed future reworking, or I've gotten to at least make progress on something that had stagnated. In fairness, I've also had years that didn't yield any long-term positives, where I came away from the month dissatisfied with an idea I'd previously been excited for, and fighting burnout for too long afterwards.
In addition to the big NaNoWriMo November challenge, I've also participated in many many of the lower-pressure "camp" events, where you can set your own writing or editing goals, and those have often helped me to push through and make progress on things I've been struggling with. I even made my own non-official-event-related goal one month and used the site to track progress on it.
And even way back as a kid I did attend a couple of their young writer events, and while it didn't lead to me being a precocious young author or anything, I felt fondly toward those events.
Having them say "it's fine not to really participate, you can still win by cheating, and maybe you're the jerk if you think that's not in the spirit of the challenge!" defies all those supposed positives of the journey itself and all, and... welp, I'm just not about that.
So I won't be participating in NaNo again, which is a shame, because it IS something I've done almost every year for somewhere around a decade, now.
It's also true that this isn't the first major controversy, and it's really not even the most serious. Last year there were the allegations of grooming by one of the mods on the all-ages forum, because there was no real oversight on said forum, and they took advantage of that. And that is some way worse shit! But I did honestly hope they were learning from that, and coming back with better protections for community members, so was willing to give them the space to try and fix those problems and make sure it couldn't happen again.
This is not "there was a bad actor that we didn't do enough to stop, and now we need to do what we can to fix the system that let it happen." This is "we are completely pivoting away from the purpose and intent of our organization in a deeply insulting way."
I was a bit on the fence about whether I'd be participating in it this year anyway, because I have some writing goals I'm still clawing through for the moment. If I could get to the point where something was ready for it, I was hoping to maybe use it to kickstart progress on something, since my most optimistic goal is currently to get something completed by earlyish next year. So a bit of a bummer, but I think I'll have alternative options if I want them.
I have seen quite a few replacement challenges already being discussed. There's a novella challenge with a 30k goal that I've seen some people expressing interest in. Several mentions have been made of NaNo municipal liaisons "keeping the discord server in the divorce" and choosing to repurpose the local groups into rogue writing groups, though I haven't seen any actual examples of that yet. (I never got into my local group; one of the main MLs went to the same school I did, but my long-time roommmate apparently had weird beef with her, lol.) Lots of people have shared links to various project trackers to help with tracking wordcounts or other goals, which was largely what I did find most helpful about NaNo, so I'll probably look into those and see if I can find one I like.